Click on the CourseID to get instructor evaluation results for a specific section

Recent Courses
CourseID Title Start Date Days Start Time Instructor Syllabus
ITMT-2302 . 01 122S Windows Server 2008 Active Director Mon, Jan 14, 2013 M W 1:30pm MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER
ITSY-2342 . 01 122S Incident Response and Handling Mon, Jan 14, 2013 M W 10:00am MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER
ITSY-2343 . 01 122S Computer System Forensics Mon, Jan 14, 2013 T R 10:00am MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER
ITMT-2301 . 01 121S Windows Server 2008 Ntwrk Infrastru Mon, Aug 27, 2012 M W 1:00pm MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER
ITSY-2301 . 01 121S Firewalls and Network Security Mon, Aug 27, 2012 T R 10:00am MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER
ITMT-2302 . 01 112S Windows Server 2008 Active Director Tue, Jan 17, 2012 M W 1:00pm MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER
ITSY-2342 . 01 112S Incident Response and Handling Tue, Jan 17, 2012 M W 10:00am MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER
ITSY-2343 . 01 112S Computer System Forensics Tue, Jan 17, 2012 T R 10:00am MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER
ITSY-2441 .FW1 112F Security Management Practices Mon, Aug 29, 2011 LAMB, TAWNY
ITMT-1340 . 01 101S Manage/Maint MS Win Serv 2003 Envir Mon, Aug 22, 2011 M W 1:00pm MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER
ITMT-1340 . 01 111S Manage/Maint MS Win Serv 2003 Envir Mon, Aug 22, 2011 M W 1:00pm MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER
ITSY-2301 . 01 111S Firewalls and Network Security Mon, Aug 22, 2011 T R 9:30am MARSHALL, CHRISTOPHER
Instructor Evaluation Results for Network Security
  Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Count % Count % Count % Count % Count Mean
1. The instructor is well prepared for classes/lessons. 35 68.6% 16 31.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 51 4.69
2. The instructor clearly communicates ideas. 39 76.5% 12 23.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 51 4.76
3. The instructor stimulates intellectual curiosity. 40 78.4% 11 21.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 51 4.78
4. The instructor demonstrates a knowledge of the subject matter. 41 80.4% 10 19.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 51 4.80
5. The instructor makes available learning outcomes in the class syllabus. 42 82.4% 9 17.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 51 4.82
6. The instructor’s use of technology improved my understanding of course material. 42 82.4% 8 15.7% 1 2.0% 0 0.0% 51 4.80
7. The instructor uses assignments to increase understanding of subject matter. 36 72.0% 14 28.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 50 4.72
8. The instructor provides adequate and timely feedback on assignments and exams. 39 78.0% 11 22.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 50 4.78
9. The instructor gives tests which cover course content. 41 80.4% 10 19.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 51 4.80
10. The instructor exhibits enthusiasm for teaching. 41 80.4% 10 19.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 51 4.80
11. The instructor generates a class atmosphere which promotes learning. 39 76.5% 12 23.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 51 4.76
12. The instructor is receptive to questions and comments from students. 42 82.4% 9 17.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 51 4.82
13. The instructor challenges students to develop ideas based on course material. 39 76.5% 12 23.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 51 4.76
14. The instructor demonstrates fairness when dealing with students. 40 78.4% 11 21.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 51 4.78
15. I am satisfied with what I learned in this course. 37 72.5% 11 21.6% 3 5.9% 0 0.0% 51 4.67
16. I value the importance of reading as a necessary part of my college education. 37 72.5% 14 27.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 51 4.73
17. I took advantage of my instructor’s office hours to resolve questions about subject matter. 30 76.9% 9 23.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 39 4.77
18. (Answer the optional statement given to you by your instructor, if applicable.) 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 4.33
19. (Answer the optional statement given to you by your instructor, if applicable.) 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 4.67
  12+ hours 9-11 hours 7-8 hours 4-6 hours 1-3 hours Total
Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count Mean
20. To prepare for this class, I studied this many hours per week: 1 1.9% 2 3.8% 9 17.3% 22 42.3% 18 34.6% 52 4.63

NOTE: Connected to FIS in 0.41123604774475 seconds

No budget information available

Rendering Information
Name Value
Start Thu, May 23, 2013 @ 9:03:57am
End Thu, May 23, 2013 @ 9:03:59am
Elapsed 2 seconds