Adamson, David

Adamson, David

Office:

ATC-206-B

Telephone:

903-983-8634

E-mail:

dadamson@kilgore.edu

Assoc. Department:

Associate Degree Nursing

Academic Degrees:

MS, Nursing, The University of Texas at Tyler
BS, Nursing, The University of Texas at Tyler
AD, Nursing, Garden City Community College
MEd, Education, Seattle Pacific University
BS, Biology, Seattle Pacific University

Add'l Qualifications:

RN License, Texas Board of Nurse Examiners
1990-2008, RN-IMC (PRN), Laird Hospital
1985-1990, RN-ICU & Home Health, Laird Hospital

Instructor Evaluation Results for Adamson, David (Adamson, David):

 

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Count % Count % Count % Count % Count Mean

1.

The instructor is well prepared for classes/lessons.

77

47.8%

78

48.4%

6

3.7%

0

0.0%

161

4.44

2.

The instructor clearly communicates ideas.

68

42.8%

73

45.9%

11

6.9%

7

4.4%

159

4.27

3.

The instructor stimulates intellectual curiosity.

69

43.7%

76

48.1%

9

5.7%

4

2.5%

158

4.33

4.

The instructor demonstrates a knowledge of the subject matter.

89

55.3%

68

42.2%

3

1.9%

1

0.6%

161

4.52

5.

The instructor makes available learning outcomes in the class syllabus.

87

54.7%

63

39.6%

7

4.4%

2

1.3%

159

4.48

6.

The instructor’s use of technology improved my understanding of course material.

68

44.2%

68

44.2%

12

7.8%

6

3.9%

154

4.29

7.

The instructor uses assignments to increase understanding of subject matter.

79

49.4%

68

42.5%

10

6.3%

3

1.9%

160

4.39

8.

The instructor provides adequate and timely feedback on assignments and exams.

88

54.7%

69

42.9%

4

2.5%

0

0.0%

161

4.52

9.

The instructor gives tests which cover course content.

71

46.4%

70

45.8%

9

5.9%

3

2.0%

153

4.37

10.

The instructor exhibits enthusiasm for teaching.

70

45.8%

66

43.1%

11

7.2%

6

3.9%

153

4.31

11.

The instructor generates a class atmosphere which promotes learning.

70

45.5%

72

46.8%

8

5.2%

4

2.6%

154

4.35

12.

The instructor is receptive to questions and comments from students.

90

55.9%

67

41.6%

1

0.6%

3

1.9%

161

4.52

13.

The instructor challenges students to develop ideas based on course material.

73

47.1%

71

45.8%

8

5.2%

3

1.9%

155

4.38

14.

The instructor demonstrates fairness when dealing with students.

99

61.9%

60

37.5%

1

0.6%

0

0.0%

160

4.61

15.

I am satisfied with what I learned in this course.

67

41.9%

76

47.5%

13

8.1%

4

2.5%

160

4.29

16.

I value the importance of reading as a necessary part of my college education.

93

58.1%

65

40.6%

1

0.6%

1

0.6%

160

4.56

17.

I took advantage of my instructor’s office hours to resolve questions about subject matter.

54

37.0%

77

52.7%

13

8.9%

2

1.4%

146

4.25

18.

(Answer the optional statement given to you by your instructor, if applicable.)

22

57.9%

16

42.1%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

38

4.58

19.

(Answer the optional statement given to you by your instructor, if applicable.)

21

58.3%

15

41.7%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

36

4.58

 

12+ hours

9-11 hours

7-8 hours

4-6 hours

1-3 hours

Total

Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count Mean

20.

To prepare for this class, I studied this many hours per week:

34

20.9%

17

10.4%

47

28.8%

51

31.3%

14

8.6%

163

7.30

Lab Evaluation Results for Adamson, David (Adamson, David):

  Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Total
Count % Count % Count % Count % Count Mean

1.

Course content and lab activities followed the syllabus student learning outcomes.

61

61.0%

38

38.0%

1

1.0%

0

0.0%

100

4.60

2.

Activities in lab reinforced concepts studied in lecture.

57

57.0%

39

39.0%

4

4.0%

0

0.0%

100

4.53

3.

The instructor was prepared and presented subject in an organized manner.

60

60.0%

37

37.0%

2

2.0%

1

1.0%

100

4.56

4.

Supplies and equipment were adequate and available for each lab.

61

60.4%

38

37.6%

2

2.0%

0

0.0%

101

4.58

5.

The instructor was familiar with lab techniques and current technology.

61

60.4%

39

38.6%

1

1.0%

0

0.0%

101

4.59

6.

The instructor monitored the laboratory activities and provided feedback during the activities.

61

60.4%

37

36.6%

3

3.0%

0

0.0%

101

4.57

7.

The lab grading system was fully explained to me.

62

62.6%

35

35.4%

2

2.0%

0

0.0%

99

4.61

8.

The instructor had a sufficient number of grades to determine my lab grades.

66

65.3%

35

34.7%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

101

4.65

9.

The method for grading assignments and tests was fair.

65

64.4%

35

34.7%

1

1.0%

0

0.0%

101

4.63

10.

Tests and assignments were returned within a reasonable time.

68

67.3%

33

32.7%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

101

4.67

11.

Lab practicals were an accurate way to measure my knowledge of course material.

64

64.0%

36

36.0%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

100

4.64

12.

The written materials were useful, up-to-date, and understandable.

58

59.2%

40

40.8%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

98

4.59

13.

The instructor explained and practiced safe lab procedures.

62

61.4%

39

38.6%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

101

4.61

14.

A safe laboratory environment was maintained throughout the semester.

64

63.4%

37

36.6%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

101

4.63

15.

The size of the lab facility was appropriate for adequate instruction.

59

58.4%

38

37.6%

3

3.0%

1

1.0%

101

4.53

16.

The number of students/lab class was appropriate for adequate instruction and maximum learning.

62

61.4%

39

38.6%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

101

4.61

17.

The instructor was accessible during lab.

66

65.3%

35

34.7%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

101

4.65

18.

The instructor generated a class atmosphere which promotes learning.

62

62.0%

36

36.0%

1

1.0%

1

1.0%

100

4.59

19.

The instructor demonstrated fairness in dealing with students.

65

64.4%

35

34.7%

1

1.0%

0

0.0%

101

4.63

20.

I would recommend this lab instructor to another student.

65

65.0%

33

33.0%

1

1.0%

1

1.0%

100

4.62

Click on the CourseID to get instructor evaluation results for a specific section

Recent Courses:

CourseID Title Start Date Days Start Time Syllabus
RNSG-1301 . 01 141S Pharmacology Mon, Aug 25, 2014 R 10:00am
RNSG-1301 . H1 141S Pharmacology Mon, Aug 25, 2014 TBA
RNSG-1301L.L01 141S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Aug 25, 2014 W 12:30pm
RNSG-1301L.L02 141S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Aug 25, 2014 T 8:30am
RNSG-1301L.L03 141S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Aug 25, 2014 T 12:30pm
RNSG-1301L.L04 141S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Aug 25, 2014 W 8:30am
RNSG-2262 .F06 135F Clinical for Mental Health Nursing Mon, May 12, 2014 F 7:00am
RNSG-1301 . 01 132S Pharmacology Mon, Jan 13, 2014 R 1:00pm
RNSG-1301 . H1 132S Pharmacology Mon, Jan 13, 2014 F 9:00am
RNSG-1301L.L01 132S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Jan 13, 2014 W 12:30pm
RNSG-1301L.L02 132S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Jan 13, 2014 T 8:30am
RNSG-1301L.L03 132S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Jan 13, 2014 T 12:30pm
RNSG-1301L.L04 132S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Jan 13, 2014 W 8:30am
RNSG-1301L.L05 132S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Jan 13, 2014 TBA
RNSG-2262 . 03 132S Clinical for Mental Health Nursing Mon, Jan 13, 2014 M 7:00am
RNSG-1301 . 01 131S Pharmacology Mon, Aug 26, 2013 R 1:30pm
RNSG-1301 . W1 131S Pharmacology Mon, Aug 26, 2013
RNSG-1301L.L01 131S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Aug 26, 2013 W 1:00pm
RNSG-1301L.L02 131S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Aug 26, 2013 T 8:30am
RNSG-1301L.L03 131S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Aug 26, 2013 T 1:00pm
RNSG-1301L.L04 131S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Aug 26, 2013 W 8:30am
RNSG-1301L.L05 131S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Aug 26, 2013 F 8:00am
RNSG-2262 .F06 125F Clinical for Mental Health Nursing Mon, May 13, 2013 F 7:00am
RNSG-1301 . 01 122S Pharmacology Mon, Jan 14, 2013 R 1:00pm
RNSG-1301L.L01 122S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Jan 14, 2013 W 12:30pm
RNSG-1301L.L02 122S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Jan 14, 2013 T 8:30am
RNSG-1301L.L03 122S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Jan 14, 2013 T 12:30pm
RNSG-1301L.L04 122S Pharmacology Lab Mon, Jan 14, 2013 W 8:30am